Page 65 - 국제학술문화제-가야사/환단고기 분과
P. 65

경남 함안의 안라국 지명 비정에 관한 비판  조용성




                  Criticism of Anra-guk’s name irregularity in Haman, Gyeongnam



                                                                                       Cho, Yong-Seong



                   From scholars from the Archaeological History Department of the Imperial University and
                 the Chosun History Pyeonsu Association under the Japanese Government-General of Korea,

                 to historians studying the history of Gaya in the present pulpit, the study of Gaya history itself
                 was a series of unhappiness. The study of Gayasa by the Japanese Government-General of
                 Korea was conducted with the intention of supporting the ‘Imna-Japan main theory’, which

                 is a representative theory of colonialism for political and military purposes. Just as if the first
                 button is wrongly inserted, the last button has no hole to put it in, Gayasa was put on wrongly

                 from the first button, which is the wrong place name for the place name. Currently, the
                 academic circle of Gangdan history accepted the Japanese colonial historians’ criticism of the
                 name of the Gaya region without criticism. As a result of this study on the history of Gaya by

                 the scholars of Gangdansa, a series of studies on the history of Gyeongnam Province and the
                 Gaya tombs was written. And based on this, it even went to UNESCO to apply for the

                 registration of the Gaya Tomb as a World Heritage Site.
                   Due to the arbitrariness of place names based on foreign historical sites such as the Nihon
                 Shoki, Kojiki, the relocation of Wijidong of the Three Kingdoms, and Yangjikgongdo, rather

                 than the original place names based on Korean librarians such as Samguksagi and Samguk
                 Yusa, there is an objection to the UNESCO World Heritage List of the Gaya Tomb in 2022.

                 claims have been made. The scholarly circle of positivist history is already pushing for the
                 naming of Gyeongsang-do and Jeolla-do based on the Nihonshoki by inserting a button and
                 then drilling more holes to insert it. “It was after 1980 that we started the study of Gayasa by

                 ourselves.” Jaewoo Nam, 「The Study of Gayasa by the Colonial View and its Overcoming」,
                 Korean Ancient History Study 61, 2011.3, 158.

                   It is said As of 2022, the achievements of 40 years of research are at the level of borrowing
                 the geographical names based on the Nihon Shoki as it is.
                   Youngsik Lee (Former Professor, Inje University, President of the Gaya History Society)

                   “The way to rule out the modern state consciousness is to go back to the Japanese shogi.” It
                 is of utmost importance to revisit the related technology through objective historical

                 criticism. However, first of all, it is necessary to take an attitude of looking at the records of the
                 Nihon Shoki as they are.” Kang Man-gil et al., 『I doubt our history』, Seohaemunjip, 2002, p.
                 46.




                                                                                                      65
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70